Opiniões da Comissão dos Direitos Humanos das Nações Unidas sobre a liquidação da organização religiosa local das Testemunhas de Jeová em Abinsk

A liquidação da organização religiosa das Testemunhas de Jeová de Abinsk violou os direitos do requerente à liberdade de religião, e a lei russa sobre extremismo contém uma redação muito vaga. A Rússia é obrigada a reconsiderar a decisão de liquidar e tomar medidas para evitar violações semelhantes no futuro.

United Nations

CCPR/C/139/D/2765/2016

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights

Distr.: General

1 February 2024

Original: English

Human Rights Committee

Views adopted by the Committee under article 5 (4) of the Optional Protocol, concerning communication No. 2765/2016 * , ** , ***

Communication submitted by:Andrey Pavlenko, Oleg Kondratenko and Konstantin Baryshev (represented by counsel, Shane H. Brady and Victor Shipilov)

Alleged victims:The authors

State party:Russian Federation

Date of communication:29 February 2016 (initial submission)

Document references:Decision taken pursuant to rule 92 of the Committee’s rules of procedure, transmitted to the State party on 12 May 2016 (not issued in document form)

Date of adoption of Views:24 October 2023

Subject matter:Dissolution of a local religious organization of Jehovah’s Witnesses for distribution of publications banned as extremist

Procedural issues:Exhaustion of domestic remedies; substantiation of claims; admissibility ratione personae

Substantive issues:Cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment; freedom of thought, conscience and religion; freedom of association; discrimination on the ground of religion; minority rights

Articles of the Covenant:7, 18 (1) and (3), 22 (1) and (2), 26 and 27

Articles of the Optional Protocol:1–3 and 5 (2) (a) and (b)

1.1 The authors of the communication are Andrey Pavlenko, Oleg Kondratenko and Konstantin Baryshev, nationals of the Russian Federation born in 1962, 1964 and 1971, respectively. They claim that the State party has violated their rights under articles 7, 18 (1) and (3), 22 (1) and (2), 26 and 27 of the Covenant. The Optional Protocol entered into force for the State party on 1 January 1992. The authors are represented by …

Voltar ao topo